The field of natural language processing is witnessing significant advancements in the development of large language models (LLMs) for medical applications. Recent research has focused on improving the clinical validity and reliability of LLMs, with a emphasis on evaluating their performance in high-stakes medical tasks such as diagnostic reasoning, treatment planning, and fact-checking. Notable developments include the creation of benchmarks and evaluation frameworks that assess the effectiveness of LLMs in medical question answering, fact-checking, and de-identification. These efforts aim to address the challenges of deploying LLMs in real-world medical applications, where accuracy, relevance, and domain-specific expertise are critical.
Some noteworthy papers in this area include: Psychiatry-Bench, which introduces a rigorously curated benchmark for evaluating LLMs in psychiatric practice. MORQA, which presents a new multilingual benchmark for assessing the effectiveness of NLG evaluation metrics in medical question answering. MedFact, which provides a challenging benchmark for Chinese medical fact-checking and highlights the need for more robust evaluation paradigms. LLM Agents at the Roundtable, which proposes a multi-agent evaluation framework for automated essay scoring that achieves human-level multi-perspective understanding and judgment. Internalizing Self-Consistency in Language Models, which introduces a reinforcement learning framework that improves the self-consistency of LMs by favoring reasoning trajectories aligned with their internal consensus.