Advances in Aligning Large Language Models with Human Values

The field of large language models (LLMs) is rapidly advancing, with a growing focus on aligning these models with human values and safety standards. Recent research has highlighted the importance of developing innovative techniques to ensure that LLMs produce outputs that are not only accurate but also safe and responsible. One of the key directions in this area is the development of frameworks that can detect and mitigate potential safety risks, such as affordance-based safety risks, where outputs inadvertently facilitate harmful actions due to overlooked logical implications. Another important area of research is the development of methods for evaluating and improving the alignment of LLMs with human preferences, including the use of metrics such as confidence-driven evaluation and steerable pluralism. Additionally, there is a growing interest in developing techniques for unsupervised debiasing and alignment of LLMs, as well as methods for estimating machine translation difficulty and evaluating LLMs on specific tasks such as Chinese idiom translation. Noteworthy papers in this area include AURA, which introduces a multi-layered framework for affordance-understanding and risk-aware alignment, and Steerable Pluralism, which proposes a few-shot comparative regression approach for pluralistic alignment. Overall, the field is moving towards developing more sophisticated and nuanced techniques for aligning LLMs with human values, with a focus on safety, responsibility, and transparency.

Sources

AURA: Affordance-Understanding and Risk-aware Alignment Technique for Large Language Models

Overconfidence in LLM-as-a-Judge: Diagnosis and Confidence-Driven Solution

Towards Integrated Alignment

Play Favorites: A Statistical Method to Measure Self-Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge

PROPS: Progressively Private Self-alignment of Large Language Models

Ethics2vec: aligning automatic agents and human preferences

Jinx: Unlimited LLMs for Probing Alignment Failures

Objective Metrics for Evaluating Large Language Models Using External Data Sources

Steerable Pluralism: Pluralistic Alignment via Few-Shot Comparative Regression

Prompt-and-Check: Using Large Language Models to Evaluate Communication Protocol Compliance in Simulation-Based Training

A Survey on Training-free Alignment of Large Language Models

UDA: Unsupervised Debiasing Alignment for Pair-wise LLM-as-a-Judge

A Comprehensive Evaluation framework of Alignment Techniques for LLMs

LaajMeter: A Framework for LaaJ Evaluation

Estimating Machine Translation Difficulty

Evaluating LLMs on Chinese Idiom Translation

Neural Machine Translation for Coptic-French: Strategies for Low-Resource Ancient Languages

Built with on top of